Sizing up the other guy

When men are getting drawn into a confrontation, they instinctively size each other up: height, build, posture, jawline, aggressiveness, presence of allies, stuff like that.

What many people don't seem to realize is that men are less likely to get into a violent altercation when there is a clear mismatch in body size.  Two men don't get into violent altercations because the strong prey upon the weak -- call it The Playground Bully Theory of Violence.  Males get into altercations when there are two somewhat evenly-matched men who need to determine which one is dominant.  Remember, males in a lot of species use non-violent dominance displays to avoid a costly conflict.

So when I heard that George Zimmerman had a 100-pound weight advantage over Trayvon Martin, I was shocked.  Sounded like Zimmerman was an aggressive vigilante.  But as it turns out, this information wasn't accurate, like so much of the early reporting on this case, even on something as objective and factual as weight.  The NYT now reports:

"...the neighborhood watch coordinator, 5 foot 9 and 170 pounds, and the visitor, 6 foot 1 and 150, wrestling on the ground."

So Zimmerman was stockier, but Martin was four inches taller.  Tragically, this makes a lot more sense.

I'd be willing to bet that Zimmerman's initial confrontation of Martin was far more aggressive and dominant than his body-size "warranted" -- because Zimmerman knew he was armed and that the police were coming.  And I would be totally unsurprised if Zimmerman didn't reveal the power mismatch.  Martin didn't know this.  All Martin knows is that he's being aggressively approached by a confrontational guy...who is four inches shorter than he is.  I wouldn't be too happy about that either.  And it escalated from there.

This mismatch in perceptions of power is the main reason why young confrontational males will get into a physical altercation.  And it results from either over-estimating your own power or under-estimating the other guy's.

When I was a senior in college, I got into a fight because of a similar dynamic.  It was the night after the last day of exams, so everybody was out in full force.  As the bar was letting out, a large fight was already underway, but the police had arrived and were breaking it up.  There were probably 3-5 police cars, and a bunch of officers.  They broke up the fight, and the crowd was dispersing.

I didn't know anyone involved in the fight, and I'm walking with a friend back to my dorm when I get bumped pretty hard by one of the guys who had been involved in the fight, who was yelling at someone else and wasn't watching where he was going.  I said, "Hey, watch it, buddy."  He spins around and says, "Who you calling buddy, buddy?"

And really, that's all it takes.

So at that point, we're face to face, neither one backing down, each sizing each other up.  Again, sizing someone up happens instinctively, it doesn't require a lot of conscious thought.  He was taller and heavier than I was, plus he was standing uphill.  He could probably clean my clock.  As it turned out, he was on the hockey team -- Harvard usually has a pretty good hockey team -- and he looked like a hockey player.  So even though I knew I probably would lose a fight if a fight took place, there were police officers all over the place, so I judged that a fight was unlikely -- though it wasn't as calculated as I'm making it sound.  Anyhow, verbally, I didn't back down and neither did he.

And then he clocked me in the face, spinning me around and splitting open my cheek.  Then he immediately ran off down an alley.  I didn't feel it, but I looked down and blood was streaming down my body.  A police officer witnessed the entire thing from about 20 feet away (don't quote me on the distance, it was a long time ago).  Then I went to the hospital and got stitches.

In a moment when you know the universe has a sense of humor, my parents had a layover in Boston the very next morning, and I was supposed to have lunch with them at the airport.  And here I am, showing up with ten stitches in my face.  (I told my parents in advance so my mom didn't have a heart attack when she saw me.)  Anyhow, that was an interesting lunch.

A week later, on the day my parents arrived in Boston for graduation, the story was on the cover of the student newspaper.  I really loved this comment by the close friend of the guy who hit me:

He added that Kelley, who took a year off before attending college to play semi-professional hockey with the U.S. hockey league, is not the confrontational type, unless provoked.

“He’s not a violent person,” Pararas said. “He doesn’t attack people—it’s not in his nature.”

Oh, those semi-pro hockey players -- so sensitive and non-violent.  Too funny.

Anyhow, I'm sharing this because there's a much more serious point: if you want to prevent violence between two unknown men, then you need to understand how the male mind works.  And so much of the ink that's been spilled on this topic has focused on racial issues that not only don't explain the incident very well, but also don't help prevent future violence in society more generally.

And that only makes the situation even more tragic than it already was.

Empathy for misers

I like to find moments in life that allow me to see things from a new perspective.  And during my two weeks as a smoker, one of the things that I noticed is how many people wanted to bum a cigarette from me.  This was a reversal for me, since in the past, I've usually been the one to bum a cigarette.  And the mentalities are totally different.

If you're bumming a cigarette, it seems like such a small and reasonable ask.  No big deal.  Come on, don't be stingy.

Now flip the script.  Cigarettes in NYC cost something just shy of $15, probably the highest in the country.  So one cigarette costs about 75 cents.  Now, that's not a lot of money on its own, but it adds up if you're a regular smoker.  And damn, it sure gets annoying when all kinds of random strangers on the street feel entitled to one of my cigarettes.  If it just happened a few times, it's no big deal.  The problem is -- it's not just a few times.  It never stops.  And eventually, you have to throw up some defenses and start telling people 'no'.

And so I'm pretty sure that's what it's like being wealthy.  People always want stuff from you: gifts, donations, taxes, investments, whatever.  I could see how it gets a little annoying with each new ask, even if the ask isn't for very much money -- in fact, especially if the ask isn't for very much money.  Because the person asking you expects you to give it and views you as stingy if you don't.

So if you are a non-wealthy person angry at stingy wealthy people, just buy a pack of cigarettes and stand somewhere with a lot of foot traffic.  Do that for long enough, and everyone becomes a miser.

Young confrontational males

There are many tragic aspects to the whole Trayvon Martin / George Zimmerman fiasco.  And I don't want to wade through this whole awful mess.  However, I would like to point out one aspect of the situation that relates specifically to men: if either one of them were a woman, the entire thing probably never would have happened, no matter what their races were.  Women rarely engage in violence towards people they don't know.

This is admittedly speculative, but I'd be willing to bet that if George Zimmerman saw a black woman walking down the street, it wouldn't have turned out the way it did.  I'm also pretty sure that if a female hispanic neighborhood watch captain saw Trayvon Martin, she most likely would have stayed in her car after calling 911.  Again, total speculation -- but not that far-fetched.

I don't know what happened that day.  None of us do.  But whichever version of events you think happened, no one can dispute that it was a confrontation between two young males that went very badly wrong.  And based on unbiased descriptions of each person, they both sound like confrontational males.  I have been in confrontations and physical fights with other men, and it really doesn't take much for men with confrontational dispositions to tick each other off and for things to escalate very rapidly.  So here's how I see it: even if there was racism, there didn't need to be very much.

It sounds completely plausible to me that it went down something like this (YCM = Young Confrontational Male):

  • YCM #1 disrespects YCM #2 
  • YCM #2 feels disrespected by YCM #1
  • Verbal escalation
  • Physical escalation
  • YCM #1 kills YCM #2

That pattern could describe a huge number of violent altercations between men.  So if you want to reduce violence, that's where you start.

Syndicate content